Allahabad High Court
CRLP/21320/2026 of DR MRS RAINA NIVEDITA SAMUEL AND 2 OTHERS Vs STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND 3 OTHERS on 7 September 2026
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 21320 of 2026 Court No. - 48 HON'BLE CHANDRA DHARI SINGH, J. HON'BLE TARUN SAXENA, J. 1. The present writ petition has been filed with the prayer to quash the impugned First Information Report dated 21.08.2026 registered as FIR No.0181
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 21320 of 2026
Court No. - 48
HON'BLE CHANDRA DHARI SINGH, J.
HON'BLE TARUN SAXENA, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. The present writ petition has been filed with the prayer to quash the impugned First Information Report dated 21.08.2026 registered as FIR No.0181 of 2026, under Sections 318(4), 336(3), 338, 340(2) of B.N.S., Police Station-Cantt., Commissionerate Prayagraj, District-Prayagraj and for a direction to the respondents not to arrest the petitioners in pursuance of impugned First Information Report.
2. Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners and learned AGA appearing on behalf of the State.
3. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners submitted that in the instant matter, after completion of investigation, final report has been forwarded before the concerned Court. He further prayed and submitted that in view of the aforesaid the instant writ petition may be disposed of.
4. Learned A.G.A. appearing on behalf of State has not disputed the aforesaid facts.
5. Taking into consideration the submissions advanced by learned counsel for the petitioner and no objection made by Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Sankalp Narain, Bindeshwari Prashad Tiwari Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A. Dr Mrs Raina Nivedita Samuel And 2 Others .....Petitioner(s) State Of Uttar Pradesh And 3 Others .....Respondent(s)
learned A.G.A. and the fact that the final report has been filed, we do not find any good reason to keep this petition pending for further adjudication.
6. In view of the above, the instant writ petition is disposed of. September 8,
SK Srivastava CRLP No. 21320 of 2026
(Tarun Saxena,J.) (Chandra Dhari Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- SAILESH KUMAR SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad Digitally signed by :- SAILESH KUMAR SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad