Allahabad High Court

NA528/37241/2026 of IBRAHIM Vs STATE OF U.P. THROUGH SECRETARY HOME UP AT LKO. on 7 September 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. - 37241 of 2026 Court No. - 75 HON'BLE DR. GAUTAM CHOWDHARY, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A. for the State. 2. The present application has been filed to direct the Trial Court/Court concerned to consider and

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. - 37241 of 2026

Court No. - 75

HON'BLE DR. GAUTAM CHOWDHARY, J.

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A. for the State.

2. The present application has been filed to direct the Trial Court/Court concerned to consider and accept the personal bond and two sureties in one criminal case treating the same for all the four criminal cases mentioned in the paragraph no. 30 of the affidavit filed in support of of the instant application.

3. Learned counsel for applicant contends that applicant is unable to arrange 6 sureties. Consequently, in spite of the fact that applicant has already been released on bail in all four criminal cases pending against him, the applicant has yet not been released from jail, as applicant has failed to furnish separate surety bonds in all the cases. In the facts and circumstances of the case, it is thus urged that applicant be directed to furnish a common personal bond and common surety bonds of like amount in all the cases. He therefore contends that appropriate direction be issued to the concerned trial Court.

4. Record shows that applicant has been enlarged on bail in different case crime number by the concerned Court vide following orders:-

(i) Case Crime No. 001 of 2026 Under Section 2 U.P. Gangsters and Anti Social Activities (Prevention) Act 1986, Police Station Narkhi District Firozabad (Present one ) Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Shashi Shankar Tripathi, Utsav Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Ibrahim .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Through Secretary Home Up At Lko. .....Opposite Party(s)

(ii) Case Crime No. 374 of 2025 Under Section 310(2), 311, 324(5),317(3) Β.N.S Police Station Narkhi District Firozabad

(iii) case crime no. 385/2025 under section 109 (1) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and Section 3/5/27 of Arms Act, Police Station Narkhi, District Firozabad,

5. He has then referred to Sections- 483, 484, 485, 486, 487, 488, 489, 490 of B.N.S.S. (hereinafter to be referred as BNSS) and on basis thereof contents that under the scheme of BNSS (hereinafter referred to as "the BNSS") there is no mandatory requirement of furnishing separate personal bonds as well as surety bonds for seeking enlargement on bail in different case crime numbers.

6. On the aforesaid factual and legal premise, learned counsel for applicant contends that such conditions which commensurate with the facts and circumstances of present case, are liable to be imposed, so that applicant who has been granted bail in all cases pending against him is ultimately bailed out.

7. Reference has also been made to the orders passed by Supreme Court dated 29.10.2018 in Hani Nishad @ Mohammad Imran @ Vikky Vs. State of U.P. and 09.08.2021 in Ramwati Awasthi & Others Vs. State of U.P. and Others. He has also referred to orders passed by this Court dated 15.03.2019 in Criminal Misc. Bail Application No.11380 of 2019, (Rizwan alias Atta Vs. State of U.P.), reported in 2019 (107) ACC 894 and 21.11.2019 in Criminal Misc. Application (under Section 482 Cr.P.C.) No.40957 of 2019, (Mobin Vs. State of U.P.), wherein Court has been modified the conditions of bail by providing that the personal bond and two sureties furnished by applicant, be accepted in all the cases pending against applicant. Photocopies of above orders have been supplied by learned counsel for applicant which are taken on record.

8. On the aforesaid factual and legal premise, it is urged that present application be allowed and two sureties furnished by applicant in one case crime number be accepted as sureties in all the cases. NA528 No. 37241 of 2026

9. Per contra, learned A.G.A. has opposed this application, but could not dispute the orders relied upon by learned counsel for applicant.

10. In view of above, present application succeeds and is liable to be allowed.

11. It is accordingly, provided that application shall be allowed to execute one personal bond and two sureties to the satisfaction of court concerned which shall hold in all four cases pending against present applicant. September 8, 2026 S.Mishra NA528 No. 37241 of 2026

(Dr. Gautam Chowdhary,J.) Digitally signed by :- SHASHI MISHRA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead