Allahabad High Court
CRLP/21325/2026 of SMT AYSHA KHATOON Vs STATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS on 7 September 2026
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 21325 of 2026 Court No. - 48 HON'BLE CHANDRA DHARI SINGH, J. HON'BLE TARUN SAXENA, J. 1. The instant writ petition has been filed with the following main reliefs:- "(i) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus to
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 21325 of 2026
Court No. - 48
HON'BLE CHANDRA DHARI SINGH, J.
HON'BLE TARUN SAXENA, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. The instant writ petition has been filed with the following main reliefs:- "(i) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus to direct Respondent No. 2 to get conduct of investigation by C.B.C.I.D. in pursuance of F.I.R. dated 10.10.2025 in Case Crime No. 573 of 2026, Under Section 318(4), 351(4), Police Station Chandpur, District Bijnor.
(ii) . Any other suitable writ, order or direction as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and necessary in the interest of justice."
2. Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and learned AGA appearing on behalf of the State and perused the material on record.
3. It is submitted by learned AGA that in the instant matter, after completion of investigation, charge sheet has been forwarded on 01.04.2026 before the concerned Court.
4. At this juncture, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submitted and prayed that the instant writ petition may be disposed of in light of the statement given by the learned A.G.A.
5. Taking into consideration the submissions advanced by learned counsel for the parties and the fact that charge sheet has already been forwarded, we do not find any good reason to keep this petition pending for further adjudication. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Danish, Rajiv Sisodia Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A. Smt Aysha Khatoon .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 2 Others .....Respondent(s)
6. In view of the above, the instant writ petition is disposed of. September 8, 2026 SK Srivastava CRLP No. 21325 of 2026 2 (Tarun Saxena,J.) (Chandra Dhari Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- SAILESH KUMAR SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad