Allahabad High Court
BAIL/30313/2026 of PRAVEEN KUMAR SINGH Vs STATE OF U.P. on 7 September 2026
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 30313 of 2026 Court No. - 69 HON'BLE AVNISH SAXENA, J. 1. Heard Sri Krishna Mani, learned counsel for the accused-applicant and learned A.G.A. for the State. 2. The present bail application has been moved by the accused-applicant
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 30313 of 2026
Court No. - 69
HON'BLE AVNISH SAXENA, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
2
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Heard Sri Krishna Mani, learned counsel for the accused-applicant and learned A.G.A. for the State.
2. The present bail application has been moved by the accused-applicant Praveen Kumar Singh to enlarge him on bail in Case Crime No. 58 of 2012, under Sections 363, 366 IPC, P.S.- Vindhyachal, District- Mirzapur, during the pendency of trial.
3. It is contended by learned counsel for the accused-applicant that the accused-applicant has been falsely implicated in the F.I.R. lodged in the year 2012 by the informant with the allegation that accused-applicant has enticed his daughter in the year 2011. Further submits that during investigation, the accused-applicant has not been arrested. It is thereafter that the charge sheet is submitted. The accused-applicant was not aware about the pendency of the case. The summons and warrants have not been served on him. The applicant himself surrendered on 07.07.2026, when he came to know about the proclamation issued against him. Further submits that the victim has married somewhere else and the informant had given a letter on 15.07.2026 to the police station that he does not want to continue with the case. The applicant has no criminal history. The applicant is in jail since 07.07.2026 and hence, the applicant seeks to be released on bail.
4. Learned A.G.A. for State has opposed the prayer for bail of the applicant, but could not dispute the aforesaid facts. Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Krishna Mani Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Praveen Kumar Singh .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. .....Opposite Party(s)
5. This Court has taken into consideration the rival submissions made by learned counsel for the parties and perused the record.
6. Considered the complicity of the accused-applicant and the letter, which is at page no.44 of the affidavit.
7. Hence, without touching merit of the case, the bail application is allowed.
8. The accused/applicant be released on bail in the aforesaid case on furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of court concerned in view of observation made by the Supreme Court in its dictums of Girish Gandhi Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh [(2024) 10 SCC 674] and Policy Strategy for grant of bail in re [(2024)10SCC 685].
9. The accused-applicant shall cooperate in judicial process for fair and speedy disposal. September 8, 2026 Shivangi BAIL No. 30313 of 2026 2 (Avnish Saxena,J.) Digitally signed by :- SHIVANGI YADAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad