Central Government Industrial Tribunal
Sh. Shiv Singh & Ors., vs FOL Depot & Ors on 30 April 2025
Sh. Shiv Singh & 3 Ors. vs. F.O.L. Depot and Ors.
I.D. no. 45/2017
BEFORE CENTRAL GOVT. INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL CUM –
LABOUR COURT NO. II, NEW DELHI
ID No. 45/2017
Sh. Shiv Singh & 3 Ors. vs. F.O.L. Depot and Others Sh. Shiv Singh & 3 others Through Hindustan Engineering & General Mazdoor Union (Regd. 4479) Head Office: D-2/24, Sultanpuri, Delhi
…Applicants/Claimants
Versus
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Union of India, Through Secretary Ministry of Defence, South Block New Delhi-01
2. Director General Army Supply Corporation (A.S.C.) Sena Bhawan, P.O. Delhi Headquarters New Delhi-11
3. Commandant, 210, F.O.L. Depot, A.S.C., Delhi Cantt, New Delhi
… Managements/respondents
Counsels: For Applicant/ Claimant: Sh. Kailash Jonwal, Ld. AR.
For Management/ Respondent: Sh. Atul Bhardwaj, Ld. AR.
Award 30.04.2025
Sh. Shiv Singh & 3 Ors. vs. F.O.L. Depot and Ors. I.D. no. 45/2017 Item No.- 33
I.D. No. 45/2017 30th April 2025 Present: The claimants in person. Sh. Atul Bhardwaj, Ld. AR for the management.
All the claimants have filed their affidavits stating that they don’t want to proceed further with the present case, as they have been reinstated in their jobs by the management. Their statements have been recorded separately.
Record perused. The present application has been filed on behalf of Sh. Shiv Singh & 3 other claimants under section 33-A of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, where the claimants alleged that their services were terminated by the management during the pendency of the case bearing I.D. no. 71/2013 titled Sh. Titu Ram & 39 Ors. vs. Ministry of Defense & Ors.
Record perused. It is noted that an award had been passed in the main I.D. no. 71/2013. The AR for the management admitted that they have filed a writ petition challenging the said award. He also admitted that the claimants have been reinstated in their jobs after six years.
In view of the statements on record, the application stands dismissed as withdrawn. A copy of this award is sent to the appropriate government for notification, as required under section 17 of the ID act 1947. The file is consigned to record room.
ATUL KUMAR GARG
Dated 30.04.2025
Presiding Officer
CGIT – cum – Labour Court – II