Allahabad High Court
WRIC/33976/2026 of SHALINI CHAURASIYA Vs STATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS on 7 September 2026
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 33976 of 2026 Court No. - 1 HON'BLE GARIMA PRASHAD, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Standing Counsel for the State. 2. By means of the present petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, petitioner has
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
WRIT - C No. - 33976 of 2026
Court No. - 1
HON'BLE GARIMA PRASHAD, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Standing Counsel for the State.
2. By means of the present petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, petitioner has prayed for the following relief: "Issue an order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the respondent no. 2 to decide the Suit No. 12618/2025 Computerized Suit No. T202514700212618 (Shalini Chaurasiya Vs JaiPrakash Yadav) Under Section 34 of Uttar Pradesh Revenue Code-2006 and pass an appropriate and reasoned order within an stipulated time given by this Hon'ble Court."
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has filed the aforesaid petition seeking mutation in the month of August, 2025 before the respondent No.2, however, the same is pending. It is further submitted that contesting respondents have filed their reply, however despite completion of pleadings, no final decision has been taken by the respondent No.2. He, therefore, prays that the respondent No.2 may be directed to decide the aforesaid case expeditiously in a time bound manner.
4. Learned Standing Counsel for the State has no objection if the respondent No.2 is directed to decide the aforesaid case in accordance with law.
5. In view thereof, this petition stands disposed of with a direction to respondent no.2/Naib Tehsildar, Athgavan Zone, Varansi, Tehsil Pindra, District Varanasi to dispose of the aforesaid pending case within a period Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Lakshman Tripathi, Sanat Kumar Tripathi Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Shalini Chaurasiya .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 2 Others .....Respondent(s)
of three months from the date of production of a certified copy of this order, in accordance with law after hearing all the parties concerned. It is made clear that no unnecessary adjournment shall be granted to either of the parties. In the event the adjournment is considered necessary and is granted, sufficient reasons must be recorded. September 8, 2026 Kuldeep WRIC No. 33976 of 2026 2 (Garima Prashad,J.) Digitally signed by :- KULDEEP SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad