Central Government Industrial Tribunal
Sh. Suresh Kumar vs L.I.C. & Anr on 4 April 2025
Sh. Suresh Kumar vs. L.I.C. of India & anr.
I.D. no. 39/2019
BEFORE CENTRAL GOVT. INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL CUM –
LABOUR COURT NO. II, NEW DELHI
ID No. 39/2019.
Sh. Suresh Kumar vs. L.I.C. and Anr.
Sh. Suresh Kumar, S/o Late Sh. Pitamber, R/o 69/1, Village- Moti Bagh, Chankya Puri, South-west, Delhi-110021.
…Applicant/Claimant
Versus
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Life Insurance Corporation of India, Jeevan Bharti LIC Building, 11th Floor, New Delhi-110001.
2. Orion Security Solutions Pvt. Ltd., 5-E, 1st Floor, Jungi House, Street No.5, Near BSES Power Station, Shahpur Jat, New Delhi-110049.
… Managements/respondents
Counsels: For Applicant/ Claimant: Sh. M.L. Pandey, Ld. AR.
For Management/ Respondent: Sh. Rajiv Katyan, Ld. AR for management-1 (Life Insurance Corporation of India). Sh. Vidyadhar Sethi, representative for management-2 (Orion Security Solutions Pvt. Ltd.)
Award 04.04.2025
Sh. Suresh Kumar vs. L.I.C. of India & anr. I.D. no. 39/2019 Item No.- 12
I.D. No. 39/2019 04th April 2025 Present: Sh. M.L. Pandey and Ms. Indu Pandey, Ld. ARs along with the claimant. Sh. Rajiv Katyan, Ld. AR for management-1. Sh. Vidyadhar Sethi, representative for management-2.
The representative for management-2 has produced a demand draft of Rs. 1,80,000/- in favour of the claimant, as agreed before the mediation cell in lieu of claims and dues. The said demand draft has been handed over to the claimant.
The statement of the claimant has been recorded separately that he has received the full and final amount and therefore wants to withdraw the case.
An amount of Rs. 3,000/- imposed earlier on management-2 has also been paid to AR for the claimant. The representative for management-2 submits that he will pay the remaining Rs. 2,000/- outside the court. His statement has also been recorded separately.
In view of the claimant’s statement on record, the claim stands dismissed as satisfied. The award is passed accordingly. A copy of this award is sent to appropriate government for notification under section 17 of the I.D. Act. The file is consigned to record room.
ATUL KUMAR GARG
Dated 04.04.2025
Presiding Officer
CGIT – cum – Labour Court – II