Allahabad High Court
BAIL/30080/2026 of VINOD KUMAR Vs STATE OF U.P. on 7 September 2026
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 30080 of 2026 Court No. - 69 HON'BLE AVNISH SAXENA, J. 1. Heard Ms. Bindu Kumari, learned counsel for the accused-applicant and learned A.G.A. for the State. 2. In pursuance of the previous order passed by this Court, the medical
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 30080 of 2026
Court No. - 69
HON'BLE AVNISH SAXENA, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
2
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Heard Ms. Bindu Kumari, learned counsel for the accused-applicant and learned A.G.A. for the State.
2. In pursuance of the previous order passed by this Court, the medical report of Brahma Dev has not been placed before this Court.
3. The present bail application has been moved by the accused-applicant Vinod Kumar to enlarge him on bail in Case Crime No. 67 of 2026, under Sections 109(1), 115(2), 351(3), 352 BNS, P.S.- Myorpur, District- Sonbhadra, during the pendency of trial.
4. It is contended by learned counsel for the accused-applicant that the F.I.R. has been lodged by the son of one of the injured with the allegation that there was some altercation between the parties on the point of allocation and distribution of Rs.400/-, which they got while playing band in the marriage. It is alleged that the assault was carried out by lathi, danda, kulhari and Baluwa. Four persons were shown injured, out of them Brahma Dev suffered grievous injuries. The injury report has not been produced. The co-accused, who has similar role, namely, Premchand, has been granted bail by the coordinate Bench of this Court in order dated 01.09.2026. There is no separate role assigned to the accused. The charge sheet is submitted. The applicant has no criminal history. The applicant is in jail since 10.06.2026 and hence, the applicant seeks to be released on bail. Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Bindu Kumari Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Vinod Kumar .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. .....Opposite Party(s)
5. Learned A.G.A. for State has opposed the prayer for bail of the applicant, but could not dispute the aforesaid facts.
6. This Court has taken into consideration the rival submissions made by learned counsel for the parties and perused the record.
7. Considered the role of accused-applicant.
8. Hence, without touching merit of the case, the bail application is allowed.
9. The accused/applicant be released on bail in the aforesaid case on furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of court concerned in view of observation made by the Supreme Court in its dictums of Girish Gandhi Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh [(2024) 10 SCC 674] and Policy Strategy for grant of bail in re [(2024)10SCC 685].
10. The accused-applicant shall cooperate in judicial process for fair and speedy disposal. September 8, 2026 Shivangi BAIL No. 30080 of 2026 2 (Avnish Saxena,J.) Digitally signed by :- SHIVANGI YADAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad