Allahabad High Court
CRLP/21360/2026 of RAMESHWAR PANDEY Vs THE STATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS on 7 September 2026
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 21360 of 2026 Court No. - 48 HON'BLE CHANDRA DHARI SINGH, J. HON'BLE TARUN SAXENA, J. 1. The instant writ petition has been filed with the following main reliefs:- "i). Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of writ of
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 21360 of 2026
Court No. - 48
HON'BLE CHANDRA DHARI SINGH, J.
HON'BLE TARUN SAXENA, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. The instant writ petition has been filed with the following main reliefs:- "i). Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of writ of mandamus commanding/directing the respondent no.2 and 3 to direct the respondent no.4, to submit/add the documentary evidence of the petitioner which was submitted by him before the respondent no.4 on 28.10.2025. ii). Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding/directing the respondent no.2 and 3 to direct the respondent no.4, he complied the order dated 28.11.2025 passed by the respondent no.2 on the application of the petitioner dated 28.11.2025."
2. Smt. Kamlaa Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner, after arguing the matter on merits, made an innocuous prayer to approach the appropriate authority with the copy of the writ petition as well as the documents appended with it to agitate the issue within a period of two weeks and further prayed that the said authority may be directed to pass appropriate reasoned order after giving opportunity of hearing to the parties concerned.
3. Per contra, Mr. S.K.Ojha, learned AGA-I, appearing for the State- respondents vehemently opposed the prayer made by the learned counsel for the petitioner but he has no objection to the innocuous prayer made by the learned counsel for the petitioner.
4. Heard Smt. Kamlaa Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner, Mr. S.K. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Kamla Singh, Vijay Shanker Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A. Rameshwar Pandey .....Petitioner(s) The State Of U.P. And 4 Others .....Respondent(s)
Ojha, learned AGA-I for the State-respondents and perused the record.
5. Taking into consideration the submissions of the learned counsel for the petitioner and the innocuous prayer as well as no objection of the learned AGA, the instant writ petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to approach the appropriate authority with the copy of the writ petition for whatever issue agitated before this Court within a period of two weeks from today and thereafter the concerned authority is directed to pass the appropriate reasoned order after providing opportunity of hearing to the parties concerned, expeditiously, preferably within a period of one month from the date of production of a certified copy of this order.
6. Learned AGA is directed to communicate this order to the authority concerned forthwith. September 8, 2026 Prajapati RK CRLP No. 21360 of 2026 2 (Tarun Saxena,J.) (Chandra Dhari Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- RAMKESH PRAJAPATI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad