Allahabad High Court
NABAIL/1199/2026 of JITENDRA YADAV Vs STATE OF U.P. on 17 May 2026
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 482 BNSS No. - 1199 of 2026 Court No. - 70 HON'BLE JAI PRAKASH TIWARI, J. At the outset, Sri Arunesh Datta, learned counsel for the applicant states that present application has become infructuous and the same may be
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 482 BNSS No.
- 1199 of 2026 Court No. - 70 HON'BLE JAI PRAKASH TIWARI, J. At the outset, Sri Arunesh Datta, learned counsel for the applicant states that present application has become infructuous and the same may be dismissed. In view of the above statement, the present application is dismissed as infructuous. May 18, 2026 Brijesh Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Arunesh Datta Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. (Jai Prakash Tiwari,J.) Jitendra Yadav .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. .....Opposite Party(s) Digitally signed by :- BRIJESH KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad