Allahabad High Court

WRIC/19265/2026 of RAM MANOHAR AND ANOTHER Vs STATE OF U.P. AND 21 OTHERS on 17 May 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 19265 of 2026 Court No. - 36 HON'BLE MANISH KUMAR NIGAM, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing Counsel for the State and perused the record. 2. The instant writ petition has been filed for the following relief: "Issue a writ

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

WRIT - C No. - 19265 of 2026

Court No. - 36

HON'BLE MANISH KUMAR NIGAM, J.

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing Counsel for the State and perused the record.

2. The instant writ petition has been filed for the following relief: "Issue a writ order or direction in the nature mandamus directing to the respondent No. 2/The Commissioner District- Prayagraj to decide the petitioner's stay application pending before him in Revision No. 682/2026 (Ram Manohar and others Vs. Shiv Prasad and others) within stipulated period."

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that the aforesaid stay application filed in Revision No. 628 of 2026, is pending consideration. It is further contended that several dates have been fixed but the same has not been decided yet. He prayed that the same may be decided, expeditiously.

4. No useful purpose would be served in keeping this petition pending.

5. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, the present petition stands disposed of finally with a direction to respondent Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Rituraj Singh, Sheetla Prasad Shukla, Shri Ram Pandey Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Ram Manohar And Another .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 21 Others .....Respondent(s)

No. 2 to consider and decide the aforementioned stay application, in accordance with law, expeditiously, preferably within a period of eight weeks from the date of production of a certified copy of this order after ensuring service upon all the opposite parties and giving opportunity of hearing to the parties concerned and without granting unnecessary adjournments to either of the parties provided that there is no other legal impediment.

May 18, 2026 Ved Prakash WRIC No. 19265 of 2026 2 (Manish Kumar Nigam,J.) Digitally signed by :- VED PRAKASH SHARMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead