Allahabad High Court

WRIC/19323/2026 of RAJ KUMAR Vs STATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS on 17 May 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 19323 of 2026 Court No. - 36 HON'BLE MANISH KUMAR NIGAM, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing Counsel for the State and perused the record. 2. The instant writ petition has been filed for the following relief: "Issue writ

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

WRIT - C No. - 19323 of 2026

Court No. - 36

HON'BLE MANISH KUMAR NIGAM, J.

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing Counsel for the State and perused the record.

2. The instant writ petition has been filed for the following relief: "Issue writ order or direction in the nature a of Mandamus directing the Respondent No.2 to decide the proceeding of Appeal No. 2484 of 2024 Computerized Case No. C202402000002484 (Bahadur Ram Bahadur Vs. Moti Lal and others) under Section 24 (4) of U.P. Revenue Code 2006, expeditiously as possible as within short stipulated period, which is pending in the court of Additional Commissioner (Administration), Prayagraj Division, Prayagraj."

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that the aforesaid appeal is pending since 2024. It is further contended that several dates have been fixed but the same has not been decided yet. He prayed that the same may be decided, expeditiously.

4. No useful purpose would be served in keeping this petition pending.

5. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, the present Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Ram Singh Kushwaha Counsel for Respondent(s) : Azad Rai, C.S.C. Raj Kumar .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 4 Others .....Respondent(s)

petition stands disposed of finally with a direction to respondent No. 2 to consider and decide the aforementioned appeal, in accordance with law, expeditiously, preferably within a period of three months from the date of production of a certified copy of this order after ensuring service upon all the opposite parties and giving opportunity of hearing to the parties concerned and without granting unnecessary adjournments to either of the parties provided that there is no other legal impediment.

May 18, 2026 Ved Prakash WRIC No. 19323 of 2026 2 (Manish Kumar Nigam,J.) Digitally signed by :- VED PRAKASH SHARMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead