Allahabad High Court

NA528/47711/2025 of RAMLAL AND 2 OTHERS Vs STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER on 13 May 2026

Cites 1, Cited by 0

JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. - 47711 of 2025 Court No. - 79 HON'BLE CHAWAN PRAKASH, J. 1. Heard Km. Rani, Advocate holding brief of Sri Manjeet Kumar, Yadav, learned counsel for the applicants, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record. 2. This application under

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. - 47711 of 2025

Court No. - 79

HON'BLE CHAWAN PRAKASH, J.

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

1

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. Heard Km. Rani, Advocate holding brief of Sri Manjeet Kumar, Yadav, learned counsel for the applicants, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record.

2. This application under Section 528 BNSS has been filed by the applicants with the prayer to quash the charge sheet dated 7.5.2021, summoning order dated 19.2.2020 passed by Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Court No.7, Aligarh as well as entire proceeding of Session Case No.332 of 2023 (State vs. Ram Lal and others) under Sections 323, 324, 328, 308 I.P.C., Police Station Dataganj, District- Budaun, pending before Additional District Judge/F.T.C.-II, Budaun.

3. After some argument, learned counsel for the applicants has made a statement at the bar, on instructions, she does not want to press other prayers made in the application and states that the applicants are ready to surrender before the court below within two weeks and seek their bail and that their bail application be considered and disposed of in view of law laid down by Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Satender Kumar Antil Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation and another reported in (2021) 10 SCC 773.

4. Learned AGA as well as states that he has no objection to the aforesaid prayer made by the counsel for the applicants for not pressing the other prayers made in the instant application. Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Manjeet Kumar, Yadav Rahul Ramkrishnan Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Ramlal And 2 Others .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. and Another .....Opposite Party(s)

5. In view of the above, in case the applicants appear before the court below within two weeks and apply for bail, their bail application be considered and disposed of in view of law laid down by Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Satender Kumar Antil Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation and another reported in (2021) 10 SCC 773 after hearing the parties.

6. Till the aforesaid period of two weeks' or till surrender before Court, whichever is earlier, no coercive steps shall be taken against the applicants in the aforesaid case.

7. With the aforesaid observations, this application under Section 528 B.N.S.S. is finally disposed of. May 14, 2026 Md Faisal NA528 No. 47711 of 2025 2 (Chawan Prakash,J.) Digitally signed by :- MOHD FAISAL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad Digitally signed by :- MOHD FAISAL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead