Allahabad High Court
WRIA/7317/2026 of POONAM VERMA Vs STATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS on 13 May 2026
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - A No. - 7317 of 2026 Court No. - 6 HON'BLE PRAKASH PADIA, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel for the respondents. 2. The petitioner was appointed on the post of Asha karyakarti and posted at Community Health Center Lodhi,
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
WRIT - A No. - 7317 of 2026
Court No. - 6
HON'BLE PRAKASH PADIA, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel for the respondents.
2. The petitioner was appointed on the post of Asha karyakarti and posted at Community Health Center Lodhi, District Aligarh pursuant to the selection made in the year 2018. On a complaint made by one Smt. Priyanka wife of Smt. Shobhit Bhardwaj, inquiry was conducted in whcih the petitioner was found guilty and her services were terminated by order impugned dated 19.02.2026 passed by the respondent no.3/Chief Medical Officer, Aligarh, copy of the same is appended as Annexure no.1 to the writ petition.
3. It is argued by learned counsel for the petitioner that before passing the order impugned, no notice or opportunity of hearing was provided to the petitioner for giving reply on the allegations made in the order impugned and the order impugned has been passed in complete violation of principles of natural justice.This fact is also clear from perusal of the order impugned.
4. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record.
5. Since the order impugned has been passed without providing any notice or opportunity of hearing to giving reply to the allegations made in the order impugned and in complete violations or principles of natural justice, the order impugned dated 19.02.2026 passed by the respondent no.3/Chief Medical Officer, Aligarh is liable to be set aside and the same is hereby Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : S.K. Verma, Vikas Mishra Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Poonam Verma .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 4 Others .....Respondent(s)
quashed.
6. The writ petition is allowed.
7. The respondent no.3/Chief Medical Officer, Aligarh is directed to pass fresh order strictly in accordance with law within three weeks from the date of production of certified copy of this order.
8. It is made clear that this order will not permit the petitioner to work on the post in question and her services will be subject matter of fresh decision taken by the respondent No.3.
May 14, 2026 saqlain WRIA No. 7317 of 2026 2 (Prakash Padia,J.) Digitally signed by :- SYED MOHAMMAD SAQLAIN HAIDER High Court of Judicature at Allahabad