Allahabad High Court

WRIC/18975/2026 of MAHESH CHANDR AND 3 OTHERS Vs STATE OF U.P. AND 8 OTHERS on 13 May 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 18975 of 2026 Court No. - 36 HON'BLE MANISH KUMAR NIGAM, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record. 2.This writ petition has been filed seeking following relief :- "1. Issue a writ of certiorari quashing the order dated

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

WRIT - C No. - 18975 of 2026

Court No. - 36

HON'BLE MANISH KUMAR NIGAM, J.

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record.

2. This writ petition has been filed seeking following relief :- "1. Issue a writ of certiorari quashing the order dated 28.10.2024 passed by the Court of the Collector, Firozabad in Case No. 1462 of 2017 (Suresh and Others vs. Suresh and Others) under Section 128 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006; and

2. Issue a writ of mandamus commanding respondent no.2 to decide the question of maintainability, limitation, and effect of pending writ proceedings first, strictly in accordance with law;

3. Issue a writ/order restraining respondents from taking coercive steps against petitioner's possession pursuant to impugned order;"

3. I have perused the order impugned, from which, it is clear that proceedings were initiated against the petitioner under Section 128 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 for cancellation of lease granted to the petitioner by the private respondents. By the order impugned, the said proceedings have been stayed on the ground that in a writ filed by the private respondents regarding cancellation of their lease, an interim order has been granted by this Court.

4. No illegality has been committed by the Court below in passing the order impugned.

5. The writ petition lacks merit and is accordingly dismissed. May 14, 2026 Rishabh Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Ashish Mishra Counsel for Respondent(s) : Avinash Chandra Srivastava, C.S.C. (Manish Kumar Nigam,J.) Mahesh Chandr And 3 Others .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 8 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- RISHABH KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead