Allahabad High Court
WRIC/18999/2026 of SMT. KALYANI DEVI Vs STATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS on 13 May 2026
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 18999 of 2026 Court No. - 36 HON'BLE MANISH KUMAR NIGAM, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and perused the record. 2. The instant writ petition has been filed for following relief: " i- issue a writ order or direction in nature of mandamus
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
WRIT - C No. - 18999 of 2026
Court No. - 36
HON'BLE MANISH KUMAR NIGAM, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and perused the record.
2. The instant writ petition has been filed for following relief: " i- issue a writ order or direction in nature of mandamus directing the respondent no. 2 to decide the Restoration Application dated 17-07-2023 filed by petitioner in Case no. RST/5907/2026 bearing its Computerized Case no. T202602030505907 (Kalyani Devi versus Madan Mohan & others), under section 116 of U.P. Revenue Code-2006 pending before the Sub Divisional Magistrate (Tehsil Level), Judicial, Tehsil Karchhana, District Prayagraj within a stipulated period as fixed by this Hon'ble Court."
3. Contention of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that restoration application is pending consideration and the same has not been decided despite several dates have been fixed. He prayed that the same may be decided, expeditiously.
4. In view of above, no useful purpose would be served in keeping this petition pending.
5. Accordingly, the present petition stands disposed of finally with a direction to the respondent No. 2 to consider and decide the aforementioned application, in accordance with law, expeditiously, preferably within a period of twelve weeks from the date of production of a certified copy of this order after ensuring service upon all the opposite parties, giving opportunity of hearing to the parties concerned and without granting unnecessary adjournments to either of the parties provided that there is no other legal impediment.
May 14, 2026 Nitika Sri. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Sandeep Kumar Tiwari Counsel for Respondent(s) : Azad Rai, C.S.C. (Manish Kumar Nigam,J.) Smt. Kalyani Devi .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 4 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- NITIKA SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad