Allahabad High Court
WRIA/7300/2026 of POSI RAM SHARMA Vs STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER on 13 May 2026
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - A No. - 7300 of 2026 Court No. - 6 HON'BLE PRAKASH PADIA, J. 1. The petitioner while working on the post of Dy. Superintendent of Police superannuated on 30.06.2025 and just before his superannuation an order dated 25.06.2025 was passed by the respondent no.2 by
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
WRIT - A No. - 7300 of 2026
Court No. - 6
HON'BLE PRAKASH PADIA, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. The petitioner while working on the post of Dy. Superintendent of Police superannuated on 30.06.2025 and just before his superannuation an order dated 25.06.2025 was passed by the respondent no.2 by which salary of the petitioner was revised w.e.f. 26.10.2024, which is under challenge in the present writ petition.
2. It is argued by counsel for the petitioner that aforesaid order has been passed without providing any opportunity or notice to the petitioner. He placed reliance upon in the case of Sunil Kumar Dubey Vs. State of U.P. and 2 others, Neutral Citation 2026:AHC:104436
3. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the records.
4. With the consent of learned counsel for the parties present writ petition is being disposed of at the admission stage itself.
5. Since the order impugned has been passed without providing any opportunity of hearing to the petitioner, the order impugned dated 25.06.2025 passed by the respondent no.2-Additional Deputy Commissioner of Police (Protocol), Commissionerate Agra is liable to be set aside Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Kailash Prakash Pandey Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Posi Ram Sharma .....Petitioner(s) State of U.P. and Another .....Respondent(s)
and the same is hereby quashed.
6. The writ petition is allowed. The respondent no.2 is directed to pass a fresh order strictly in accordance with law after providing an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner. The order impugned will be subject to final outcome of fresh order. May 14, 2026 Pramod Tripathi WRIA No. 7300 of 2026 2 (Prakash Padia,J.) Digitally signed by :- PRAKASH PADIA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad