Allahabad High Court
NA528/52381/2025 of SANJEEV @ KARU AND ANOTHER Vs STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER on 13 May 2026
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. - 52381 of 2025 Court No. - 79 HON'BLE CHAWAN PRAKASH, J. 1. Heard Sri Sharad Kumar, learned counsel for the applicants, Sri Durgesh Kumar Tripathi, learned Brief Holder for the State and perused the record. 2. The present application under
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. - 52381 of 2025
Court No. - 79
HON'BLE CHAWAN PRAKASH, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Heard Sri Sharad Kumar, learned counsel for the applicants, Sri Durgesh Kumar Tripathi, learned Brief Holder for the State and perused the record.
2. The present application under Section 528 B.N.S.S. has been filed to quash the entire proceeding of Charge Sheet No. 01 of 2018 dated 15.02.2018 in Session Case No. 954 of 2022 (State of U.P. Vs. Sanjeev @ Karu and another), arising out of Case Crime No. 663 of 2017, under Sections 452, 307, 323, 325, 504, 506 I.P.C., Police Station Shikohabad, District Firozabad, pending int he court of Additional Session Judge, Court No. 10, Firozabad.
3. Learned counsel for the applicants submits that the applicants and opposite party no. 2 have entered into a compromise and they have amicably settled their dispute outside the court and no dispute is pending between them, therefore, does not want to get adjudication of alleged criminal act and prayed that the aforesaid criminal case may be quashed. He further submits that the applicants shall file compromise deed before the learned trial court for verification.
4. Learned A.G.A. for the State submits that he has no objection if the parties approach trial court to file compromise deed in the given circumstances.
5. Whether the parties have entered into compromise, can best be adjudicated by the trial court. As such, the parties may appear before the Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Sharad Kumar Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Sanjeev @ Karu And Another .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. and Another .....Opposite Party(s)
trial court and file the compromise deed entered into between the parties within 30 days, which shall be verified by the trial court. The trial court shall place the original compromise deed in its record.
6. No compromise shall be entertained by the trial court if the informant/victim and accused are not signatories and appear before the court of its verification. In case of exigency, the trial court shall apply its mind and pass appropriate order.
7. For a period of two months, the proceedings of the trial court shall be kept in abeyance, if the compromise is filed and verified within stipulated period, otherwise, the trial court shall continue with the trial in accordance with law.
8. All the parties, who files compromise deed and get it verified shall then file a joint application invoking inherent power of this Court to quash the criminal proceeding.
9. In view of above, the application under Section 528 B.N.S.S. is accordingly disposed of. May 14, 2026 Rmk. NA528 No. 52381 of 2025 2 (Chawan Prakash,J.) Digitally signed by :- RAM MURTI KUSHWAHA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad