Allahabad High Court
WRIC/16444/2026 of SONU Vs STATE OF U.P. AND 18 OTHERS on 11 May 2026
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 16444 of 2026 Court No. - 40 HON'BLE SARAL SRIVASTAVA, J. HON'BLE GARIMA PRASHAD, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri R.K. Pal, learned Standing Counsel for the State. 2. Petitioner by means of the present writ petition has prayed for the
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
WRIT - C No. - 16444 of 2026
Court No. - 40
HON'BLE SARAL SRIVASTAVA, J.
HON'BLE GARIMA PRASHAD, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri R.K. Pal, learned Standing Counsel for the State.
2. Petitioner by means of the present writ petition has prayed for the following relief: "(i) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus, commanding and directing the respondent authorities to decide the representation dated 03.04.2026 moved by the petitioner within stipulated period and to take necessary action against the Respondent No.4 to 6.
(ii) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus, commanding and directing the respondent authorities to protect the life of petitioner."
3. This Court on 29.04.2026 sought instructions from the learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the State. Sri R.K. Pal, learned Standing Counsel has placed the instructions on record. In the instructions, it has been stated that the police is not harassing the petitioner. Para 17 of the instructions reads as under: "17. यह िक इस ्ऺस्तर के संबंध में कथन है िक आवेदक ्षारा िकया गया कथन असत्य, मनगा़ंत और िनराधार है। पुिलस ्षारा ऐसी कोई कायर्वाही आवेदक व उसके पिरवार के साथ नहीं की गई है।"
4. In view of the aforesaid submission made by the learned Standing Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Sonu Malik Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Sonu .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 18 Others .....Respondent(s)
Counsel for the State, no further order is required to be passed.
5. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of. May 12, 2026 Kuldeep WRIC No. 16444 of 2026 2 (Garima Prashad,J.) (Saral Srivastava,J.) Digitally signed by :- KULDEEP SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad