Allahabad High Court
WRIC/18557/2026 of YOGESH KUMAR SAUKAND AND 2 OTHERS Vs STATE OF U.P. AND 5 OTHERS on 11 May 2026
OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 18557 of 2026 Court No. - 40 HON'BLE SARAL SRIVASTAVA, J. HON'BLE GARIMA PRASHAD, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned Standing Counsel for the State. 2. Petitioners by means of the present writ petition have prayed for the
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
WRIT - C No. - 18557 of 2026
Court No. - 40
HON'BLE SARAL SRIVASTAVA, J.
HON'BLE GARIMA PRASHAD, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned Standing Counsel for the State.
2. Petitioners by means of the present writ petition have prayed for the following reliefs: "(a) to issue a writ order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the Respondent nos.2 to 5 not to evict to the Petitioners from their possession pertaining to the arazi Nos. 113, 114, 115, 116 and 117 situated at Village Raipur Tappa Nagal, Pargana and Tehsil Sadar Bijnor, District Bijnor without any legal order; (b) to issue a writ order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the Respondent nos.2 to 5 not to take any coercive action against the Petitioners;
(c) to issue a writ order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the Respondent concern to take legal action against the Respondent no.6/. Satyanarayan Bhatnagar in the instant matter forthwith in the interest of justice;
3. The dispute is essentially a private dispute between the petitioner and the private respondent No.6.
4. Since the dispute is a private dispute between the petitioner and the private respondent No.6, therefore, the present writ petition is not the proper remedy as this Court cannot issue direction against a private person under Article 226 of the Constitution. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Arvind Kumar Srivastava, Shailesh Kumar Srivastava Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Santosh Kumar Yogesh Kumar Saukand And 2 Others .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 5 Others .....Respondent(s)
5. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed with liberty to the petitioners to avail appropriate remedy available in law. May 12, 2026 Kuldeep WRIC No. 18557 of 2026 2 (Garima Prashad,J.) (Saral Srivastava,J.) Digitally signed by :- KULDEEP SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad