Allahabad High Court
WRIC/37554/2025 of SANJAY SINGH @ SANJAY KUMAR SINGH Vs STATE OF U.P. AND 8 OTHERS on 11 May 2026
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 37554 of 2025 Court No. - 36 HON'BLE MANISH KUMAR NIGAM, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel for the State-respondents. 2. This writ petition has been filed by the petitioner seeking compliance of the order dated
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT
ALLAHABAD
WRIT - C No. - 37554 of 2025
Court No. - 36
HON'BLE MANISH KUMAR NIGAM, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel for the State-respondents.
2. This writ petition has been filed by the petitioner seeking compliance of the order dated 16.10.2021 passed by respondent No. 4, Tehsildar (Judicial), Sadar, Azamgarh in Suit No. 308, Computerized Suit No. T20171567012002 (Report vs. Rajesh Singh) under Section 67 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 against respondent No. 7.
3. The petitioner claims himself to be an inhabitant of the said village.
4. Learned Standing Counsel has raised a preliminary objection that, in view of the law laid down by this Court, including in Manbhavati vs. State of U.P. and others reported in 2020 1 AWC 789 A writ jurisdiction cannot ordinarily be invoked for execution or enforcement of orders passed by revenue courts. It is further submitted that the petitioner has an efficacious statutory remedy available under Section 460 of the U.P. Revenue Code, Manual, 2016 for execution/enforcement of the order in question.
5. In view of the availability of an alternative statutory remedy, I am not inclined to interfere in the matter. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Ashish Kumar Srivastava, Atul Kumar Srivastava Counsel for Respondent(s) : Ankush Tandon, C.S.C., Rameshwar Prasad Shukla Sanjay Singh @ Sanjay Kumar Singh .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 8 Others .....Respondent(s)
6. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to avail such remedy as may be available to him under law.
May 12, 2026 Sumaira WRIC No. 37554 of 2025 2 (Manish Kumar Nigam,J.) Digitally signed by :- SUMAIRA AQUIL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad Digitally signed by :- SUMAIRA AQUIL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad