Allahabad High Court

WRIC/18448/2026 of ARYAN AMUSEMENT Vs STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS on 11 May 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 18448 of 2026 Court No. - 40 HON'BLE SARAL SRIVASTAVA, J. HON'BLE GARIMA PRASHAD, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. 2. The petitioner by means of the present writ petition has prayed for the following relief:- "i. Issue a writ or

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

WRIT - C No. - 18448 of 2026

Court No. - 40

HON'BLE SARAL SRIVASTAVA, J.

HON'BLE GARIMA PRASHAD, J.

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner.

2. The petitioner by means of the present writ petition has prayed for the following relief:- "i. Issue a writ or direction in the nature of mandamus directing/commanding the District Magistrate Agra/Respondent no.2 to permit the petitioner for organize the fair upon the land situated at Kothi Meena Bazar Shahganj Agra over area 8,000 Sq. meter land from 10 May 2026 to 20th June 2026 during the summer vacation of the children, as the aforesaid land is under the custody of District Magistrate, Agra."

3. Sri K.D. Mishra, learned Standing Counsel has produced instruction, which is taken on record, according to which, the land on which petitioner wants to organize fair (मेला) is disputed and status quo order is operating on the said land. Para-3 of the instruction is reproduced herein below:- "3. प्ऴावली पर उपलब्ध अिभलेखानुसार कोठी मीना बाजार से सम्बिन्धत ्ऺथम अपील संख्या-309/2025 जनपद आगरा (उ०्ऺ० राज्य ्षारा कलक्टर, आगरा बनाम् ्शी राम िसह (मृतक) आिद में मा० उच्च न्यायालय, इलाहाबाद ्षारा पािरत आदेश िदनांक 23.04.2025 ्ष ारा िनम्न आदेश पािरत िकये गये थेः- Until further Orders of this court parties are directed to maintain status quo with respect to the nature and possession over the property in question."

4. In such view of the fact, the relief prayed for by the petitioner cannot be Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Mukesh Chandra Gupta, Shubham Prakash Gupta Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Aryan Amusement .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s)

granted.

5. Consequently, writ petition lacks merit and is hereby dismissed with no order as to costs. May 12, 2026 Sattyarth WRIC No. 18448 of 2026 2 (Garima Prashad,J.) (Saral Srivastava,J.) Digitally signed by :- SATTYARTH ANAND High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead