Allahabad High Court

CRLP/6994/2023 of PANKAJ KUMAR UPADHYAY Vs STATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS on 6 May 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 6994 of 2023 Court No. - 1 HON'BLE AJIT KUMAR, J. HON'BLE INDRAJEET SHUKLA, J. 1. Heard Sri Ashutosh Mishra, learned counsel for the petitioner. 2. It is submitted that in this case the matter was sent to the Mediation and Conciliation

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 6994 of 2023

Court No. - 1

HON'BLE AJIT KUMAR, J.

HON'BLE INDRAJEET SHUKLA, J.

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. Heard Sri Ashutosh Mishra, learned counsel for the petitioner.

2. It is submitted that in this case the matter was sent to the Mediation and Conciliation Centre of the High Court, however the opposite party did not appear and hence mediation failed. He submits that the amount that was deposited with the Mediation Centre by the petitioner which was to be withdrawn by the opposite parties since has not been withdrawn is liable to be refunded.

3. We have perused the office report which runs as under : "It is most humbly submitted that as per report submitted by the Legal Cell, O/o Director General of Police, Uttar Pradesh, chargesheet has been filed. Therefore, In view of above, the case is put up for order before Hon'ble Court."

4. Thus, it is clear that in this matter, charge-sheet has already been submitted by the police.

5. In the circumstances, we decline to grant indulgence in the matter any further.

6. However liberty rest with the petitioner to apply before appropriate forum questioning the charge-sheet by drawing appropriate proceedings. Insofar as the money deposited with the Registrar of the Mediation and Conciliation Centre of the High Court is concerned, since it has not been withdrawn the Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Ashutosh Mishra Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A. Pankaj Kumar Upadhyay .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 2 Others .....Respondent(s)

money meant to be paid to the opposite party shall be permitted to be withdrawn by the petitioner and amount shall accordingly be refunded.

7. Petition is accordingly dismissed, consigned to records with aforesaid liberty. May 7, 2026 Pratima CRLP No. 6994 of 2023 2 (Indrajeet Shukla,J.) (Ajit Kumar,J.) Digitally signed by :- PRATIMA AGRAHARI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead