Allahabad High Court
CRLP/10400/2026 of VINOD SINGH @ VINOD KUMAR SINGH AND 7 OTHERS Vs STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS on 6 May 2026
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 10400 of 2026 Court No. - 47 HON'BLE J.J. MUNIR, J. HON'BLE TARUN SAXENA, J. 1. Heard Mr. Rajesh Kumar Singh, learned Counsel for the petitioners and Ms. Manju Thakur, learned Additional Government Advocate-I appearing on behalf of the
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 10400 of 2026
Court No. - 47
HON'BLE J.J. MUNIR, J.
HON'BLE TARUN SAXENA, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Heard Mr. Rajesh Kumar Singh, learned Counsel for the petitioners and Ms. Manju Thakur, learned Additional Government Advocate-I appearing on behalf of the State.
2. A perusal of the impugned First Information Report ('FIR' for short) shows that during the construction of a public road, the petitioners, along with the other accused, not only obstructed the Sub-Divisional Magistrate and the other Government employees in going about their duty, but also used criminal force for the purpose. They resorted to brickbatting at the Police and revenue officials, which led to a pandemonium in the locale. The local residents closed their doors and windows as a result of the attack on the revenue and police team.
3. This is a matter, which requires thorough investigation, and whatever the petitioners argue, saying that there were injuries on their side also, are matters which belong the realm of defence. All these matters can be examined during investigation, and if the petitioners are charge-sheeted, at the trial. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Rajesh Kumar Singh, Vinod Kumar Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A. Vinod Singh alias Vinod Kumar Singh and others .....Petitioner(s) State of U.P. and others .....Respondent(s)
4. No case for interference with the impugned FIR is made out.
5. In the result, this petition fails and is dismissed.
6. The Registrar (Compliance) is directed to communicate this order to the Superintendent of Police, Deoria and the Station House Officer, Police Station Shrirampur, Deoria, both through the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Deoria. May 7, 2026 I. Batabyal/S.K. Srivastava CRLP No. 10400 of 2026 2 (Tarun Saxena,J.) (J.J. Munir,J.) Digitally signed by :- ISHAN BATABYAL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad