Allahabad High Court

WRIC/11873/2026 of RISHABH CHAUDHARY Vs STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND 3 OTHERS on 6 May 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 11873 of 2026 Court No. - 40 HON'BLE SARAL SRIVASTAVA, J. HON'BLE GARIMA PRASHAD, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel for the State-respondents. 2. The grievance of the petitioner is that he has filed an application

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

WRIT - C No. - 11873 of 2026

Court No. - 40

HON'BLE SARAL SRIVASTAVA, J.

HON'BLE GARIMA PRASHAD, J.

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel for the State-respondents.

2. The grievance of the petitioner is that he has filed an application before the respondent-authority for grant of sports scholarship in a fair, transparent and reasoned manner, but till date no action has been taken on the same.

3. Learned Standing Counsel submits that no useful purpose would be served in keeping the writ petition pending and appropriate direction may be issued to respondent No.2/the Director (Sports), Department of Sports, Lucknow to consider the grievance of the petitioner.

4. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and without adverting into the merits of the case, we dispose off the writ petition permitting the petitioner to file a fresh representation alongwith certified copy of this order raising all his grievance before the respondent No.2 within a period of one month from today. In case, any such representation is filed by the petitioner, the respondent No.2 shall consider and decide the same in accordance with law within a period of one month from the date he receives the representation of the petitioners. May 7, 2026 Kuldeep Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Ashwani Kumar Soni, Pradeep Yadav, Vinod Kumar Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Garima Prashad,J.) (Saral Srivastava,J.) Rishabh Chaudhary .....Petitioner(s) State Of Uttar Pradesh And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- KULDEEP SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead