Central Government Industrial Tribunal
Sh. Ram Karan vs AAI & Ors on 2 April 2025
BEFORE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDSUTRIAL
TRIBUNAL – CUM – LABOUR COURT-II, NEW
DELHI
I.D. NO. 47/2014
Sh. Ram Karan, S/o Sh. Har Kishan,
Through-Airport Employees Union, BTR Bhawan, 13A Rouse Avenue, New Delhi-110002.
VERSUS
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. The Director, AAI, Rajiv Gandhi Bhawan, Safdarjung Airport, New Delhi, New Delhi-110003.
2. APM Air Cargo Terminal Services, 107, Transport Centre, Punjabi Bagh, New Delhi, New Delhi-110035.
3. The Director, M/s Celebi Delhi Cargo Terminal Management India Pvt. Ltd., Room No. 23, Import Building, 1st Floor, International Cargo Terminal, IGI Airport, New Delhi-110037.
4. The Director, DIAL, Udaan Bhawan, IGI Airport, New Delhi, New Delhi-110037.
AWARD
1. The appropriate Government has sent the reference refered dated 04.04.2014 to this tribunal for adjudication in the following words:
“Whether the retirement of the workman Sh. Ram Karan S/o Sh. Har Kish on the basis of recorded of his date of birth as 12.02.52 is just, fair and legal?” “Whether the retirement or compulsory retirement of the workman Sh. Ram Karan S/o Sh. Har Kish may be treated as retrenchment? If yes whether he is entitled to notice pay, compensation, leave encashment etc.? If not what relief the workman concerned is entitled to?”
2. After receiving the reference workman had filed the claim statement. W.S had been filed by the respondents. Issues were framed vide order dated 28.11.2016. Workman was asked to lead evidence however, he had not appeared. His cross-examination is closed.
3. Now, the matter is listed for management evidence, but neither the workman nor his AR has been appearing from several dates.
4. In these circumstances, when the claimant has not been appearing since long, it appears that he is not interested in perusing his case. Hence, His claim stands dismissed. Reference is answered accordingly. A copy of this award is sent to the appropriate government for notification as required under section 17 of the ID act 1947. File is consigned to record room.
ATUL KUMAR GARG Date: 02.04.2025
Presiding Officer.
CGIT-cum-Labour Court-II