Allahabad High Court

WRIC/17731/2026 of OM JI Vs STATE OF U.P. AND 7 OTHERS on 5 May 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 17731 of 2026 Court No. - 36 HON'BLE MANISH KUMAR NIGAM, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties, learned Standing Counsel for the State and perused the record. 2. The instant writ petition has been filed for following relief: "( A ) Issue a writ

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

WRIT - C No. - 17731 of 2026

Court No. - 36

HON'BLE MANISH KUMAR NIGAM, J.

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. Heard learned counsel for the parties, learned Standing Counsel for the State and perused the record.

2. The instant writ petition has been filed for following relief: "(A) Issue a writ order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing to the respondents authority to summon the record patta allotment patrawali 1974-75 allotted by the Tehsil Authority Village Umari. (B) Issue a writ order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing to the respondents authority to restrain the respondent Nos. 4 to 7 for illegal construction of the petitioner land gata No. 2337 area 150 square yard which is situated at Village and Mauza Umari, Tehsil and District Auraiya."

3. From the perusal of the averments as well as prayer made in the writ petition, it appears that petitioner has dispute with private person/respondent.

4. Learned Standing Counsel raised a preliminary objection that such a writ petition is not maintainable for a private dispute and Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Raj Kumar Srivastava, Shiv Poojan Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Hari Narayan Singh Om Ji .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 7 Others .....Respondent(s)

in the garb of the present petition the petitioner wants to settle his private dispute.

5. In view of the above, I am not inclined to interfere in the matter.

6. Accordingly, the petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to seek relief as available to him under provisions of U.P. Revenue Code, 2006.

May 6, 2026 Ved Prakash WRIC No. 17731 of 2026 2 (Manish Kumar Nigam,J.) Digitally signed by :- VED PRAKASH SHARMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad Digitally signed by :- VED PRAKASH SHARMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead