Allahabad High Court
WRIA/6759/2026 of SMT. NEETU AGARWAL Vs M/S SHRI SAI DIESEL AND GENERATORS AND 2 OTHERS on 5 May 2026
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - A No. - 6759 of 2026 Court No. - 35 HON'BLE DR. YOGENDRA KUMAR SRIVASTAVA, J. Heard Sri Mohd. Zaid, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Harish Chandra Kesari, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel appearing for the respondent no.3. The present petition
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - A No. - 6759 of 2026 Court No. - 35 HON'BLE DR. YOGENDRA KUMAR SRIVASTAVA, J. Heard Sri Mohd. Zaid, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Harish Chandra Kesari, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel appearing for the respondent no.3. The present petition has been filed seeking a direction to the respondent No.3, to decide the Case No. 1600 of 2025 (Computerized Case No.D202513160001600) [Smt. Neetu Agarwal Vs. M/s Shri Sai Diesel and Generators and Another], under Section 21(2) of the Uttar Pradesh Regulation of Urban Premises Tenancy Act, 2021, expeditiously and within a stipulated time period. Referring to the 'order sheet' of the case, a copy whereof has been appended to the petition, it is submitted that the case was instituted on 25.9.2025 and thereafter although several dates have been fixed, but for some reason or the other, the case is being adjourned and the delay in disposal of the case is causing undue hardship to the petitioner. Attention is also drawn to Section 33(2) of the Uttar Pradesh Urban Premises Tenancy Act, 2021, wherein it is provided that the Rent Authority shall endeavour to dispose of the case as expeditiously as possible and not exceeding sixty days from the date of receipt of the application. Accordingly, the petitioner, by way of the present petition has sought for proceedings to be concluded expeditiously.
Counsel appearing for the respondent no.3 has no objection to the Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Aditi Agarwal, Prateek Kumar Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Smt. Neetu Agarwal .....Petitioner(s) M/S Shri Sai Diesel And Generators And 2 Others .....Respondent(s)
proceedings being expedited.
In view of the order proposed to be passed, issuance of notice to the tenant- respondents, is dispensed with. Having regard to the aforesaid, the writ petition is disposed of with an observation that the court/authority concerned would make an endeavour to decide the aforesaid case, in accordance with law, expeditiously preferably within a period of sixty days without granting any unnecessary adjournments to either of the parties and keeping in view the statutory mandate, as noted above, provided there is no other legal impediment. May 6, 2026 Arun K. Singh WRIA No. 6759 of 2026 2 (Dr. Yogendra Kumar Srivastava,J.) Digitally signed by :- ARUN KUMAR SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad