Allahabad High Court

WRIC/17803/2026 of KARAM SINGH Vs STATE OF U.P. AND 17 OTHERS on 5 May 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 17803 of 2026 Court No. - 36 HON'BLE MANISH KUMAR NIGAM, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record. 2. This writ petition has been filed seeking following relief :- "Issue a writ order of direction in the nature of mandamus

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

WRIT - C No. - 17803 of 2026

Court No. - 36

HON'BLE MANISH KUMAR NIGAM, J.

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record.

2. This writ petition has been filed seeking following relief :- "Issue a writ order of direction in the nature of mandamus directing the respondent no. 2 to decide the restoration application along with application under section 5 of Limitation Act dated 30.10.2025 of the petitioner filed in Case No. 70 of 2016 as well as Computer Case No. T 201609550202432) now New Case No. 213197 of 2025 as well as Computer Case No T 202509550213197 (Karam Singh Versus Ram Kishan and others) under section 176 of U.P. Z.A. Act, Village Bhaleri Jansath, Paragna Jolly Thesil Jansath, District Muzaffarnagar, within a stipulated time as fixed by this Hon'ble Court,"

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the above-mentioned case is pending consideration since 2016 and the same has not been decided till date. Learned counsel prayed that the same may be decided, expeditiously.

4. Since the above-mentioned case is pending, no useful purpose would be served in keeping this petition pending.

5. In view of the above, this writ petition stands disposed of with a direction to respondent no.2 to decide the above-mentioned case, in accordance with law, expeditiously, preferably within twelve weeks from the date of production of a certified copy of this order, after ensuring service of notice upon all the respondents and providing opportunity of hearing to all the concerned parties provided there is no other legal impediment. May 6, 2026 Rishabh Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Pradeep Kumar Bhardwaj Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Kaushal Kishore Mani (Manish Kumar Nigam,J.) Karam Singh .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 17 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- RISHABH KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead