Allahabad High Court
WRIC/16428/2026 of RAM GOPAL Vs STATE OF U.P. AND 12 OTHERS on 5 May 2026
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 16428 of 2026 Court No. - 36 HON'BLE MANISH KUMAR NIGAM, J. 1.Learned counsel for the petitioner prays for and is permitted to correct the prayer clause during course of the day. 2. Heard learned counsel for the parties, learned Standing Counsel for the
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
WRIT - C No. - 16428 of 2026
Court No. - 36
HON'BLE MANISH KUMAR NIGAM, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Learned counsel for the petitioner prays for and is permitted to correct the prayer clause during course of the day.
2. Heard learned counsel for the parties, learned Standing Counsel for the State and perused the record.
3. The instant writ petition has been filed for the following relief: "Issue a writ order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing to the Respondent No. 2 Additional Commissioner (Judicial) Prayagraj Division Prayagraj to decide the appeal /case no 1422 of 2024 (Computer case no. C202402000001422) Laxmikant Dixit vs Rakesh Kumar and others under Section 207 of U.P Revenue Code 2006 pending before him expeditiously within stipulated period. So, justice may be done."
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that the aforesaid appeal is pending since 2024. It is further contended that several dates have been fixed but the same has not been decided yet. He prayed that the same may be decided, expeditiously.
5. No useful purpose would be served in keeping this petition pending.
6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, the present petition stands disposed of finally with a direction to respondent No. 2 to consider and decide the aforementioned appeal, in accordance with law, expeditiously, preferably Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Aadarsh Mohan Pandey, Harshvardhan Tripathi, Himanshu Shukla Counsel for Respondent(s) : Azad Rai, C.S.C. Ram Gopal .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 12 Others .....Respondent(s)
within a period of six months from the date of production of a certified copy of this order after ensuring service upon all the opposite parties and giving opportunity of hearing to the parties concerned and without granting unnecessary adjournments to either of the parties provided that there is no other legal impediment. May 6, 2026 Ved Prakash WRIC No. 16428 of 2026 2 (Manish Kumar Nigam,J.) Digitally signed by :- VED PRAKASH SHARMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad