Allahabad High Court

NABAIL/3594/2026 of MUKESH CHAUHAN AND 3 OTHERS Vs STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS on 5 May 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 482 BNSS No. - 3594 of 2026 Court No. - 71 HON'BLE AVNISH SAXENA, J. 1. Ms. Pratiksha Rai, learned counsel for the applicants hands up the supplementary affidavit annexing the injury report. The same is taken on record. 2.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

CRIMINAL MISC. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 482 BNSS No.

Court No. - 71

HON'BLE AVNISH SAXENA, J.

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. Ms. Pratiksha Rai, learned counsel for the applicants hands up the supplementary affidavit annexing the injury report. The same is taken on record.

2. Heard Ms. Rai, learned counsel for accused-applicants and learned A.G.A. for the State.

3. The present anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of BNSS has been filed by the applicants with a prayer to release them on anticipatory bail in Case Crime No. 144 of 2026, under Sections 110, 109(1), 132, 121(2), 352, 115(2), 189(4), 191(3), 191(2) BNS and 7 Criminal Law Amendment Act, P.S.- Ali Nagar, District- Chandauli, during pendency of the trial.

4. It is reflected that the applicants have not approached the sessions court for anticipatory bail application. Hence, learned counsel for the applicants seeks to withdraw the application to move the anticipatory bail through counsel before the trial court, but seeks protection of liberty till the disposal of anticipatory bail application.

5. The application is dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty.

6. The applicants shall move the application for anticipatory bail through counsel within a period of 30 days from the date of this order, during which period, the applicants shall not be arrested. Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Girja Shanker Mishra, Pratiksha Rai Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Mukesh Chauhan And 3 Others .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. And 3 Others .....Opposite Party(s)

7. The certified copies of the relevant documents be provided to the applicants on production of photostat copies of it. May 6, 2026 Shivangi NABAIL No. 3594 of 2026

(Avnish Saxena,J.) Digitally signed by :- SHIVANGI YADAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead