Allahabad High Court
WRIC/17703/2026 of SAI DEEN Vs STATE OF U.P. AND 8 OTHERS on 5 May 2026
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 17703 of 2026 Court No. - 36 HON'BLE MANISH KUMAR NIGAM, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing Counsel for the State-respondents and perused the record. 2. The writ petition has been filed for the following relief: "i. Issue
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
WRIT - C No. - 17703 of 2026
Court No. - 36
HON'BLE MANISH KUMAR NIGAM, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing Counsel for the State-respondents and perused the record.
2. The writ petition has been filed for the following relief: "i. Issue a writ, order of direction in the nature of mandamus commanding and directing the respondent No.2 to 4 to remove illegal encroachment of house constructed by the respondent No.6 to 9 over the Gata No.429 situated at Village-Tilausa, Tehsil-Baberu, District-Banda.
ii. Issue a writ, order of direction in the nature of mandamus commanding and directing the respondent No.2 to 4 to decide the representation dated 03.12.2025, 20.02.2026 and 26.02.2026 meved before the respondent No.2 to 4 within stipulated period as may be fixed by this Hon'ble Court, so that justice be done."
3. Contention of learned counsel for the petitioner is that an order under Section 67 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 has been passed against the respondents on 31.01.2025 but the same has not been given effect to. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Lallu Singh, Saroj Kumar Rajpoot Counsel for Respondent(s) : Achal Singh, C.S.C. Sai Deen .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 8 Others .....Respondent(s)
4. Learned Standing Counsel has raised a preliminary objection that writ petition cannot be filed for execution of orders passed by the Revenue Court in view of the judgment of Division Bench of this Court in case of Manbhavati Vs. State of U.P. and others reported in 2020 1 AWC 789A.
5. Accordingly, the petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to approach the authority concerned for redressal of his grievance.
May 6, 2026 Ved Prakash WRIC No. 17703 of 2026 2 (Manish Kumar Nigam,J.) Digitally signed by :- VED PRAKASH SHARMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad