Allahabad High Court
WRIC/17740/2026 of ADV. DHIRENDRA SINGH AND 2 OTHERS Vs THE CHAIRMAN/SECRETARY BAR COUNCIL OF INDIA AND 3 OTHERS on 5 May 2026
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 17740 of 2026 Court No. - 40 HON'BLE SARAL SRIVASTAVA, J. HON'BLE GARIMA PRASHAD, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the respondents. 2. The petitioners, by means of present writ petition, have sought for following
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
WRIT - C No. - 17740 of 2026
Court No. - 40
HON'BLE SARAL SRIVASTAVA, J.
HON'BLE GARIMA PRASHAD, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the respondents.
2. The petitioners, by means of present writ petition, have sought for following releif; "I) Issue a suitable writ order or direction in the nature of Certiorari quashing and setting aside the order impugned dated 12.10.2025 passed by the learned Disciplinary Committee BAR Council of U.P. 19, Maharishi Dayanand Marg, Prayagraj in Complaint Case No. 445/2024 (Pankaj Bishnoi Adv. Vs. Ajay Goyal Adv. and others) (Annexure No. 1) to this writ petition. II) Issue a suitable writ order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the respondents not to interfere in the peaceful practicing of petitioners at the Bar Association, Nazibabad, District Bijnor."
3. Learned Standing Counsel for the State submits that the petitioners have an alternative remedy to file appeal under Section 37 of the Advocates Act, 1961. He further submits that no useful would be served in keeping the writ petition pending and appropriate direction may be issued to the respondent no.2 to consider the grievance of the petitioner.
4. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and without Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Vinod Kumar Counsel for Respondent(s) : Ashok Kumar Tiwari, Sai Girdhar Adv. Dhirendra Singh And 2 Others .....Petitioner(s) The Chairman/Secretary Bar Council Of India And 3 Others .....Respondent(s)
adverting into the merits of the case, we dispose off the writ petition permitting the petitioners to file appeal before the respondent no. 2 within a period of one month from today. In case, any such appeal is filed by the petitioners, the respondent no.2 shall consider and decide the same in accordance with law within a period of one month from the date he receives the representation of the petitioners. May 6, 2026 Sachin Mishra WRIC No. 17740 of 2026 2 (Garima Prashad,J.) (Saral Srivastava,J.) Digitally signed by :- SACHIN MISHRA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad