Allahabad High Court
NABAIL/4351/2026 of RAMAN Vs STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER on 5 May 2026
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 482 BNSS No. - 4351 of 2026 Court No. - 70 HON'BLE JAI PRAKASH TIWARI, J. Heard learned counsel for the applicant as well as learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the material available on record. This anticipatory bail
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 482 BNSS No.
Court No. - 70 HON'BLE JAI PRAKASH TIWARI, J. Heard learned counsel for the applicant as well as learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the material available on record. This anticipatory bail application has been filed on behalf of the applicant seeking anticipatory bail in Case Crime No. 26/2025 under Sections - 318(4), 111(2), 61(2) BNS and Section- 66D of I.T. Act, Police Station - Cybercrime District - Kannuaj during the pendency of trial. Urge has been made on behalf of the applicant that the applicant has no concern with the offence alleged against him. The applicant is innocent and has been falsely implicated in this case. No offence has been committed by the applicant. It is further submitted that the applicant has no involvement in the monetary transactions. It is also submitted that the applicant has no knowledge of any withdrawal of money from his account. In case the applicant is granted anticipatory bail, there is no possibility of misusing the liberty of anticipatory bail. Learned A.G.A. has contended that the accusation levelled against the applicant is specific. Insofar as the allegations are concerned, the same is very much apparent on record and charge sheet has already been submitted against the applicant after due investigation. In this case, bare perusal of the first information report itself shows that Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Sanjeev Kumar Trivedi Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Raman .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. and Another .....Opposite Party(s)
the allegations are specific against the applicant. In case the applicant has any grievance, he may avail remedy before the appropriate forum. No good ground is made out for anticipatory bail. Consequently, the instant anticipatory bail application is rejected. It is made clear that observation made in this order shall have no bearing on the merits of the case. May 6, 2026 S.K. NABAIL No. 4351 of 2026
(Jai Prakash Tiwari,J.) Digitally signed by :- SWEETY KANOJIA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad