Allahabad High Court

WRIC/16413/2026 of OMPAL AND 7 OTHERS Vs STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS on 5 May 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 16413 of 2026 Court No. - 36 HON'BLE MANISH KUMAR NIGAM, J. 1. This petition has been filed for the following relief: " A . Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of certiorari quashing the impugned judgment and order dated 29.08.2025 passed by

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

WRIT - C No. - 16413 of 2026

Court No. - 36

HON'BLE MANISH KUMAR NIGAM, J.

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. This petition has been filed for the following relief: "A. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of certiorari quashing the impugned judgment and order dated 29.08.2025 passed by the respondent No.2 (Additional Commissioner (Administration), Saharanpur Division, Saharanpur) in Appeal No. 205 of 2024 (State of Uttar Pradesh Versus Ompal and others) and also the judgment and order dated 28.07.2023 passed by the respondent No.3 (Sub Divisional Officer, Tehsil Sadar, District Muzaffar Nagar) in case no. 6224 of 2022(State of Uttar Pradesh Versus Ompal and others) under section 38(2) of the U. P. Revenue Code, 2006 by which the name of the recorded tenure holders (petitioners) have been removed from the khatauni of the property in question, so that, justice may be done. B. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding and directing the respondent No.3 (Sub Divisional Officer, Tehsil Sadar, District Muzaffar Nagar) to correct the khatuni of property in question and the same may be recorded as bhumihdar with transferable rights (1Ka) in place of pond."

2. A preliminary objection has been raised by learned Standing Counsel that the order impugned is revisable.

3. In view of above, I am not inclined to interfere in the matter.

4. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of with liberty to the Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Dev Kant Trigunait Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Kaushal Kishore Mani Ompal And 7 Others .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s)

petitioners to avail the remedy as available to them under the law.

5. Office is directed to return the certified copies of the documents annexed with the petition to learned counsel for the petitioners after retaining photocopy of the same on record. May 6, 2026 Nitika Sri. WRIC No. 16413 of 2026 2 (Manish Kumar Nigam,J.) Digitally signed by :- NITIKA SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead