Allahabad High Court
NABAIL/3701/2026 of ANCHAL SHARMA Vs STATE OF U.P. on 5 May 2026
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 482 BNSS No. - 3701 of 2026 Court No. - 70 HON'BLE JAI PRAKASH TIWARI, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A. for the State. 2. Present Criminal Misc. Anticipatory Bail Application has been filed
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
CRIMINAL MISC. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 482 BNSS No.
Court No. - 70
HON'BLE JAI PRAKASH TIWARI, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A. for the State.
2. Present Criminal Misc. Anticipatory Bail Application has been filed by the applicant with the prayer to enlarge the applicant on bail in Case Crime No. 23 of 2026, under Section 103(1), 238-A, 61(2) of B.N.S., Police Station Babrala, District Sambhal, during the pendency of trial.
3. Urge has been made on behalf of the applicant that the applicant has no concern with the offence alleged against him. The applicant is innocent and has been falsely implicated in this case. No offence has been committed by the applicant. In case the applicant is granted anticipatory bail, there is no possibility of misusing the liberty of anticipatory bail.
4. Learned A.G.A. has contended that the accusation levelled against the applicant is specific.
5. Insofar as the allegations are concerned, the same is very much apparent on record and statements recorded under Section 180 B.N.S.S. has already been submitted against the applicant after due investigation.
6. In this case, bare perusal of the first information report itself shows that the allegations are specific against the applicant. In case the applicant has any grievance, he may avail remedy before the appropriate forum. No good ground is made out for anticipatory bail. Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Vijay Pratap Singh Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Anchal Sharma .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. .....Opposite Party(s)
7. Consequently, the instant anticipatory bail application is rejected.
8. It is made clear that observation made in this order shall have no bearing on the merits of the case. May 6, 2026 T.S. NABAIL No. 3701 of 2026
(Jai Prakash Tiwari,J.) Digitally signed by :- TRIBHUWAN SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad