Allahabad High Court

WRIC/17631/2026 of RAJENDRA PRASAD GOEL Vs STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS on 5 May 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 17631 of 2026 Court No. - 1 HON'BLE AJIT KUMAR, J. HON'BLE INDRAJEET SHUKLA, J. 1. Sri Srijan Pandey, learned Advocate has put in appearance on behalf of the respondent No.- 3, namely RERA, Gautam Buddh Nagar by filing vakalatnama which is taken on record.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

WRIT - C No. - 17631 of 2026

Court No. - 1

HON'BLE AJIT KUMAR, J.

HON'BLE INDRAJEET SHUKLA, J.

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. Sri Srijan Pandey, learned Advocate has put in appearance on behalf of the respondent No.- 3, namely RERA, Gautam Buddh Nagar by filing vakalatnama which is taken on record.

2. Heard Sri Akhilesh Kumar Pandey, learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri Srijan Pandey, learned counsel for the RERA and learned Standing Counsel for the State respondents.

3. By means of this petition filed under 226 of the Constitution, petitioner has prayed for following relief: "1. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus direct to the Respondent No. 2 to the Collector/ District Magistrate Gautam Buddh Nagar to take appropriate action for execute the recovery certificate dated 27.01.2026 issued by respondent No. 3, Secretary U.P.Real Estate Regularity Authority, U/S 40 of U.P. Real Estate (Development and Exchange) Act,2016 in complaint No. NCR144/07/121734/2024 (Rajendra Prasad Goel Vs M/s WTC Noida Development Pvt. Ltd.)."

4. Sri Srijan Pandey, learned counsel appearing for RERA and learned Standing Counsel appearing for State respondents do not have any objection in the event respondent No.- 2, namely Collector/ District Magistrate, Gautam Budh Nagar is directed to decide the pending matter of recovery in a stipulated period of time. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Akhilesh Kumar Pandey, Asit Kumar, Hitesh Kumar Mishra Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Mohd. Afzal Rajendra Prasad Goel .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s)

5. In view of the above, this petition stands disposed of with a direction to the respondent No.- 2 to consider and dispose of the matter of recovery pursuant to the recovery certificate dated 27.01.2026 as expeditiously as possible preferably within a period of two months from the date of presentation of certified copy of this order, if otherwise, there is no legal impediment. May 6, 2026 IrfanUddin WRIC No. 17631 of 2026 2 (Indrajeet Shukla,J.) (Ajit Kumar,J.) Digitally signed by :- IRFAN UDDIN SIDDIKI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead