Allahabad High Court
NABAIL/2569/2026 of MITTHU MISHRA Vs STATE OF U.P. on 5 May 2026
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 482 BNSS No. - 2569 of 2026 Court No. - 70 HON'BLE JAI PRAKASH TIWARI, J. Heard learned counsel for the applicant as well as Sri Rajeev Kumar Singh, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the material available on record.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 482 BNSS No.
Court No. - 70 HON'BLE JAI PRAKASH TIWARI, J. Heard learned counsel for the applicant as well as Sri Rajeev Kumar Singh, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the material available on record. This anticipatory bail application has been filed on behalf of the applicant seeking anticipatory bail in Case Crime No. 63/2025 under Sections - 8/22 Narcotics Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act,1985, and Section- 111 of BNS Police Station - Rohaniya District - Varanasi, during the pendency of trial. Urge has been made on behalf of the applicant that the applicant has no concern with the offence alleged against him. The applicant is innocent and has been falsely implicated in this case. No offence has been committed by the applicant. In case the applicant is granted anticipatory bail, there is no possibility of misusing the liberty of anticipatory bail. Learned A.G.A. has contended that the accusation levelled against the applicant is specific. Insofar as the allegations are concerned, the same is very much apparent from the record that the FIR has been lodged against six accused persons including the applicant. It is also apparent that specific allegation has been made in the FIR against the present applicant. In this case, bare perusal of the first information report itself shows that the allegations are specific Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Raj Raghuvanshi Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Mitthu Mishra .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. .....Opposite Party(s)
against the applicant. No good ground is made out for anticipatory bail. In case the applicant has any grievance, he may avail remedy before the appropriate forum. Consequently, the instant anticipatory bail application is rejected. It is made clear that observation made in this order shall have no bearing on the merits of the case. May 6, 2026 S.K. NABAIL No. 2569 of 2026
(Jai Prakash Tiwari,J.) Digitally signed by :- SWEETY KANOJIA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad