Allahabad High Court
WRIC/17855/2026 of SANTOSH KUMAR Vs STATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS on 5 May 2026
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 17855 of 2026 Court No. - 36 HON'BLE MANISH KUMAR NIGAM, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing Counsel for the State and perused the record. 2. The instant writ petition has been filed for following relief: "Issue a writ
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
WRIT - C No. - 17855 of 2026
Court No. - 36
HON'BLE MANISH KUMAR NIGAM, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing Counsel for the State and perused the record.
2. The instant writ petition has been filed for following relief: "Issue a writ order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding or directing respondent no.3 to comply the order dated 19.03.26 which is pending within stipulated period."
3. From the perusal of the averments as well as prayer made in the writ petition, it appears that petitioner has dispute with a private respondent/person.
4. Learned Standing Counsel raised a preliminary objection that such a writ petition is not maintainable for a private dispute.
5. In view of the above, I am not inclined to interfere in the matter.
6. Accordingly, the petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to seek relief as available to him under provisions of U.P. Revenue Code, 2006. May 6, 2026 Ved Prakash Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Mohit Verma Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Manish Kumar Nigam,J.) Santosh Kumar .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- VED PRAKASH SHARMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad