Allahabad High Court

WRIC/17776/2026 of SANJEEV VISHWAKARMA Vs STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS on 5 May 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 17776 of 2026 Court No. - 36 HON'BLE MANISH KUMAR NIGAM, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and perused the record. 2. The instant writ petition has been filed for following relief: " A . Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

WRIT - C No. - 17776 of 2026

Court No. - 36

HON'BLE MANISH KUMAR NIGAM, J.

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and perused the record.

2. The instant writ petition has been filed for following relief: "A. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding respondent No. 2 to decide the case No. 6235 of 2025 (Sanjeev Vishwakarma V/s Vinda Devi) having computer No. T202505440206235 arising out U/s 34 U.P. Revenue Act 2006 relating Village Sonvarsa, Post and Tahsil Hata, District Kushinagar which is still pending before him till date within stipulated period fixed by this Hon'ble."

3. Contention of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that aforementioned case is pending since 2025 and the same has not been decided despite several dates have been fixed. He prayed that the same may be decided, expeditiously.

4. In view of above, no useful purpose would be served in keeping this petition pending.

5. Accordingly, the present petition stands disposed of finally with a direction to respondent No. 2 to consider and decide the aforementioned case, in accordance with law, expeditiously, preferably within a period of six months from the date of production of a certified copy of this order after ensuring service upon all the opposite parties, giving opportunity of hearing to the parties concerned and without granting unnecessary adjournments to either of the parties provided that there is no other legal impediment.

May 6, 2026 Nitika Sri. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Janardan Shukla Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Manish Kumar Nigam,J.) Sanjeev Vishwakarma .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- NITIKA SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead