Allahabad High Court
WRIC/17564/2026 of RAMCHANDRA Vs STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS on 5 May 2026
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 17564 of 2026 Court No. - 36 HON'BLE MANISH KUMAR NIGAM, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties, learned Standing Counsel for the State and perused the record. 2. The instant writ petition has been filed for the following relief: "To issue a writ
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
WRIT - C No. - 17564 of 2026
Court No. - 36
HON'BLE MANISH KUMAR NIGAM, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Heard learned counsel for the parties, learned Standing Counsel for the State and perused the record.
2. The instant writ petition has been filed for the following relief: "To issue a writ in the nature of Mandamus directing the directing the respondent no.2 to decide the Restoration Application filed in Case No. 6129 of 2022 (Computer Case No.T202212610106129 (Ram Chandra Vs. Gaon Sabha Chaudhera Bangar & others), U/s 144 of U.P. Revenue Code-2006 expeditiously and within stipulated period as fixed by this Hon'ble Court and further be pleased to direct the respondent no.4 not to interfere in peaceful possession over the land in dispute during pendency of restoration application."
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that the aforesaid restoration application is pending since 2022. It is further contended that several dates have been fixed but the same has not been decided yet. He prayed that the same may be decided, expeditiously.
4. No useful purpose would be served in keeping this petition pending.
5. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, the present petition stands disposed of finally with a direction to respondent No. 2 to consider and decide the aforementioned application, in accordance with law, expeditiously, preferably within a period of twelve weeks from the date of production of a Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Surendra Pal Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Sher Bahadur Singh Ramchandra .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s)
certified copy of this order after ensuring service upon all the opposite parties and giving opportunity of hearing to the parties concerned and without granting unnecessary adjournments to either of the parties provided that there is no other legal impediment. May 6, 2026 Ved Prakash WRIC No. 17564 of 2026 2 (Manish Kumar Nigam,J.) Digitally signed by :- VED PRAKASH SHARMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad