Allahabad High Court
WRIC/17560/2026 of DAYARAM YADAV Vs STATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS on 4 May 2026
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 17560 of 2026 Court No. - 36 HON'BLE MANISH KUMAR NIGAM, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record. 2. This writ petition has been filed seeking following relief :- "( A ). Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
WRIT - C No. - 17560 of 2026
Court No. - 36
HON'BLE MANISH KUMAR NIGAM, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record.
2. This writ petition has been filed seeking following relief :- "(A). Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of certiorari quashing the impugned demarcation report of Lekhpal in RC Form-19 dated 08.01.2025 and RC Form-20 dated 03.07.2025, as well as in pursuance of that passing the impugned dispossession order dated 17.07.2025 passed by respondent No. 4 against the petitioner.
(B). Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding respondent concerned and directing the not to create any Interference in peaceful possession/occupation of the petitioner, over the land in question."
3. Contention of learned counsel for the petitioner is that against an order passed under Section 67 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, restoration application filed by the petitioner on 1.4.2026 is pending. During pendency of the restoration application, notice has been issued on 5.4.2026 for implementation of the order passed under Section 67.
4. Since the above-mentioned restoration application is pending, no useful purpose would be served in keeping this petition pending.
5. In view of the above, this writ petition stands disposed of with a direction to the Court below to decide the above-mentioned restoration application, in accordance with law, expeditiously, preferably within three months from the date of production of a certified copy of this order, after ensuring service of notice upon all the respondents and providing opportunity of hearing to all the concerned parties provided there is no other legal impediment. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Subhash Chandra Yadav Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Pradeep Singh Dayaram Yadav .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 4 Others .....Respondent(s)
6. Till disposal of the above-mentioned restoration application, parties are directed to maintain status quo.
7. It is further provided that petitioner shall co-operate in disposal of the aforesaid application and will not seek any undue adjournments to linger on the proceedings and in case any effort is being made by the petitioner, the interim protection granted by this Court shall automatically be vacated.
May 5, 2026 Rishabh WRIC No. 17560 of 2026 2 (Manish Kumar Nigam,J.) Digitally signed by :- RISHABH KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad