Allahabad High Court
WRIC/17452/2026 of M/S CHANDA CATERERS AND ANOTHER Vs STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS on 4 May 2026
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 17452 of 2026 Court No. - 40 HON'BLE SARAL SRIVASTAVA, J. HON'BLE GARIMA PRASHAD, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing Counsel for the State-respondents and Sri Vinayak Nath Singh, learned counsel for respondent no.4 2. The
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
WRIT - C No. - 17452 of 2026
Court No. - 40
HON'BLE SARAL SRIVASTAVA, J.
HON'BLE GARIMA PRASHAD, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing Counsel for the State-respondents and Sri Vinayak Nath Singh, learned counsel for respondent no.4
2. The grievance of the petitioner is that respondent-authority is not paying the admitted dues of Rs.9,60,000/- to the petitioner for supply of food packets and bottled water to the beneficiaries of the various developmental schemes launched by the Government of India and State of Uttar Pradesh during the foundation ceremony of Jewar International Airport at NOIDA held on 25.11.2021 despite the fact that a letter in this regard has been written by the District Magistrate, Bulandshahar to the District Magistrate, Gautam Buddh Nagar appearing on page 15 of the writ petition, but till date, no amount has been released in favour of petitioner.
3. Learned counsel for the respondents submits that no useful purpose would be served in keeping the writ petition pending and appropriate direction may be issued to the respondent no.2 to consider the grievance of the petitioner.
4. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and without adverting into the merits of the case, we dispose off the writ petition permitting the petitioner to file a fresh representation alongwith certified copy of this order raising all his grievances before the respondent no.2-District Magistrate, Bulandshahar within a period of one month from today. In case, any such representation is filed by the petitioner, the respondent no.2 shall consider and decide the same in accordance with law within a period of one month from the date he receives the representation of the petitioner. May 5, 2026 Sattyarth Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Manoj Kumar Tiwari Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Vinayak Nath Singh (Garima Prashad,J.) (Saral Srivastava,J.) M/S Chanda Caterers And Another .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- SATTYARTH ANAND High Court of Judicature at Allahabad