Allahabad High Court
WRIC/17561/2026 of NAFIS KHAN Vs STATE OF U.P. AND 5 OTHERS on 4 May 2026
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 17561 of 2026 Court No. - 40 HON'BLE SARAL SRIVASTAVA, J. HON'BLE GARIMA PRASHAD, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. 2. The petitioner by means of the present writ petition has prayed for the following relief:- "i. Issue a writ, order or
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
WRIT - C No. - 17561 of 2026
Court No. - 40
HON'BLE SARAL SRIVASTAVA, J.
HON'BLE GARIMA PRASHAD, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner.
2. The petitioner by means of the present writ petition has prayed for the following relief:- "i. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the respondent no.4 & 5 to grant permission to the petitioner for selling the packed meet of male buffalo (भैंसा) from his shop situated in Naya Nagar Pratham, Tehsil Manjhanpur, District Kaushambi after obtaining the same from Sarkari Support Unnao Slaughter House, District Unnao within a short stipulated period, which this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper under the facts and circumstances of the case.
ii. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the respondent no.4 & 5 to consider and decide the applications dated 21.02.2026 and 17.04.2026 (Annexure No.2 & 3 to the writ petition) within a short stipulated period which this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper under the facts and circumstances of the case.
iii. Issue any other writ, order or direction in any other suitable nature which this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper under the facts and circumstances of the case.
iv. Award the cost of the instant writ petition in favour of the petitioner."
3. Section 31(3) of the Food Safety and Standards Act, 2006 (hereinafter referred to as 'Act, 2006') provides that an application has to be submitted in the manner containing such particulars and fees as may be specified by regulations before the designated officer. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Suresh Singh Tomer Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Madan Mohan Srivastava Nafis Khan .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 5 Others .....Respondent(s)
4. We do not find from the record that any such application has been filed by the petitioner complying with the requirement of Section 31(3) of the Act, 2006.
5. In such view of the fact, we are not inclined to grant the relief prayed for by the petitioner.
6. However, in case petitioner submits an application in accordance with the procedure contemplated under Section 31(3) of the Act, 2006 before the Competent Authority, it is expected from the Competent Authority to decide the same expeditiously in accordance with law.
7. Accordingly, with the aforesaid observations, the writ petition is dismissed. May 5, 2026 Sattyarth WRIC No. 17561 of 2026 2 (Garima Prashad,J.) (Saral Srivastava,J.) Digitally signed by :- SATTYARTH ANAND High Court of Judicature at Allahabad