Allahabad High Court
WRIC/17482/2026 of DHANESH KUMAR UPADHYAY Vs STATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS on 4 May 2026
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 17482 of 2026 Court No. - 36 HON'BLE MANISH KUMAR NIGAM, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and perused the record. 2. The instant writ petition has been filed for following relief: " (1)Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
WRIT - C No. - 17482 of 2026
Court No. - 36
HON'BLE MANISH KUMAR NIGAM, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and perused the record.
2. The instant writ petition has been filed for following relief: " (1)Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the respondent no.2 i.e. The Nayab Tehsildar Panasa, Tehsil Karchhana, District Prayagraj to decide the proceeding of mutation suit по. 15878 of 2024 (Computerized case no. T20242030515878 (Chandra Shekhar Upadhyay Versus Arun Kumar Upadhyay) under section 34 of U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 pending in the court of the The Nayab Tehsildar Panasa, Tehsil Karchhana, District Prayagraj, expeditiously if possible within stipulated period fixed by this Hon'ble Court, otherwise the applicant shall suffer irreparable loss and injury. And/or to pass such other and further order which this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper under the facts and circumstances of the case."
3. Contention of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that aforementioned case is pending since 2024 and the same has not been decided despite several dates have been fixed. He prayed that the same may be decided, expeditiously.
4. In view of above, no useful purpose would be served in keeping this petition pending.
5. Accordingly, the present petition stands disposed of finally with a direction to respondent No. 2 to consider and decide the aforementioned Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Narendra Kumar Pathak Counsel for Respondent(s) : Azad Rai, C.S.C. Dhanesh Kumar Upadhyay .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 2 Others .....Respondent(s)
case, in accordance with law, expeditiously, preferably within a period of six months from the date of production of a certified copy of this order after ensuring service upon all the opposite parties, giving opportunity of hearing to the parties concerned and without granting unnecessary adjournments to either of the parties provided that there is no other legal impediment.
May 5, 2026 Nitika Sri. WRIC No. 17482 of 2026 2 (Manish Kumar Nigam,J.) Digitally signed by :- NITIKA SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad