Allahabad High Court
WRIC/17558/2026 of SURYANATH Vs STATE OF U.P. AND 54 OTHERS on 4 May 2026
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 17558 of 2026 Court No. - 36 HON'BLE MANISH KUMAR NIGAM, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, Shri M.J. Akhtar, learned counsel for respondent no.3 and perused the record. 2. This writ petition has been filed seeking following relief :-
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
WRIT - C No. - 17558 of 2026
Court No. - 36
HON'BLE MANISH KUMAR NIGAM, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, Shri M.J. Akhtar, learned counsel for respondent no.3 and perused the record.
2. This writ petition has been filed seeking following relief :- "issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus direct the respondent no.2 i.e. Additional District Magistrate (Judicial), Mandal Gorakhgpur, Tehsil Kasya, District Kushinagar to decide the Case No.RST/162/2023, Computer Case No.D202305440000162 (Suryanath and others Vs. Ramdei and others), under Section 30 of U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 within stipulated time as fixed by this Hon'ble Court."
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the above-mentioned case is pending consideration since 2023 and the same has not been decided till date. Learned counsel prayed that the same may be decided, expeditiously.
4. Since the above-mentioned case is pending, no useful purpose would be served in keeping this petition pending.
5. In view of the above, this writ petition stands disposed of with a direction to respondent no.2 to decide the above-mentioned application, in accordance with law, expeditiously, preferably within six months from the date of production of a certified copy of this order, after ensuring service of notice upon all the respondents and providing opportunity of hearing to all the concerned parties provided there is no other legal impediment. May 5, 2026 Rishabh Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : M.J. Akhtar, Munna Tiwari, Sandeep Kumar Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Manish Kumar Nigam,J.) Suryanath .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 54 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- RISHABH KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad