Allahabad High Court
WRIC/17528/2026 of SAROJ SONKAR Vs STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND 2 OTHERS on 4 May 2026
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 17528 of 2026 Court No. - 36 HON'BLE MANISH KUMAR NIGAM, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and perused the record. 2. The instant writ petition has been filed for following relief: " I. Issue a Writ, order, or direction in the nature of
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
WRIT - C No. - 17528 of 2026
Court No. - 36
HON'BLE MANISH KUMAR NIGAM, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and perused the record.
2. The instant writ petition has been filed for following relief: " I. Issue a Writ, order, or direction in the nature of Mandamus commanding the Respondent No. 2 to decide the Case No. 3991/2025 (Saroj Sonkar vs. Vinay Kumar) expeditiously, preferably within a period of one month."
3. Contention of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that aforementioned case is pending since 2025 and the same has not been decided despite several dates have been fixed. He prayed that the same may be decided, expeditiously.
4. In view of above, no useful purpose would be served in keeping this petition pending.
5. Accordingly, the present petition stands disposed of finally with a direction to respondent No. 2 to consider and decide the aforementioned case, in accordance with law, expeditiously, preferably within a period of six months from the date of production of a certified copy of this order after ensuring service upon all the opposite parties, giving opportunity of hearing to the parties concerned and without granting unnecessary adjournments to either of the parties provided that there is no other legal impediment.
May 5, 2026 Nitika Sri. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Shachindra Kumar Mishra Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Manish Kumar Nigam,J.) Saroj Sonkar .....Petitioner(s) State Of Uttar Pradesh And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- NITIKA SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad