Allahabad High Court
WRIC/17530/2026 of SAI DEEN Vs STATE OF U.P. AND 9 OTHERS on 4 May 2026
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 17530 of 2026 Court No. - 36 HON'BLE MANISH KUMAR NIGAM, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record. 2. The present writ petition has been filed for the following relief:- "Issue a writ, order of direction in the nature of
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
WRIT - C No. - 17530 of 2026
Court No. - 36
HON'BLE MANISH KUMAR NIGAM, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record.
2. The present writ petition has been filed for the following relief:- "Issue a writ, order of direction in the nature of mandamus commanding and directing the respondent No.2 to 4 to remove illegal encroachment of house constructed by the respondent No.6 to 10 over the Gata No.429 situated at Village-Tilausa, Tehsil-Baberu, District-Banda. Issue a writ order of direction in the nature of mandamus commanding and directing the respondent No.2 to 4 to decide the representation dated 03.12.2025, 20.02.2026 and 26.02.2026 moved before the respondent No.2 to 4 within stipulated period as may be fixed by this Hon'ble Court, so that justice be done."
3. A preliminary objection has been raised by learned Standing Counsel for the State that the writ petition is not maintainable for execution of orders passed by the Revenue Court in view of the judgment of Division Bench of this Court in case of Manbhavati Vs. State of U.P. and others reported in 2020 1 AWC 789A.
4. Accordingly, the petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to avail the remedy as available to him under law. May 5, 2026 Nitika Sri. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Lallu Singh, Saroj Kumar Rajpoot Counsel for Respondent(s) : Achal Singh, C.S.C. (Manish Kumar Nigam,J.) Sai Deen .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 9 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- NITIKA SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad