Allahabad High Court
WRIC/17393/2026 of RAJNARAYAN SINGH Vs STATE OF U.P. AND 13 OTHERS on 4 May 2026
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 17393 of 2026 Court No. - 36 HON'BLE MANISH KUMAR NIGAM, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record. 2. This writ petition has been filed seeking following relief :- "Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
WRIT - C No. - 17393 of 2026
Court No. - 36
HON'BLE MANISH KUMAR NIGAM, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record.
2. This writ petition has been filed seeking following relief :- "Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the Respondent No. 3 to remove the encroachment / illegal possession of Respondent No. 5 to 14 over the land Gata 319 (which is belongs to Chak Marg) situated in Village Madari Post Sisiwan, Tehsil Soraon District Prayagraj.
Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the Respondent No. 3 to remove the possession of Respondent No. 5 to 14 from Gata No. 319 situated in Village Madari Post Sisiwan, Tehsil Soraon District Prayagraj in compliance of the order passed by the Assistant Collector Soraon Prayagraj on 10.11.2022, 25.09.2025 and 26.12.2025 Case No. 08342 to 08348 of the Year 2019 and its computerized Case No. T201902030308342 to T201902030308348, Under Section 67 of U.P. Revenue Code 2006.
Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the respondent no.3 to decide the application dated 06.01.2026 Under Para 460 of U.P. Revenue Court manual with in stipulated period or which may be fixed by this Hon'ble Court."
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the above-mentioned application dated 6.1.2026 is pending consideration, the same has not been decided till date. Learned counsel prayed that the same may be decided, expeditiously.
4. Since the above-mentioned application is pending, no useful purpose would Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Priyavrat Tripathi Counsel for Respondent(s) : Azad Rai, C.S.C. Rajnarayan Singh .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 13 Others .....Respondent(s)
be served in keeping this petition pending.
5. In view of the above, this writ petition stands disposed of with a direction to respondent no.3 to decide the above-mentioned application, in accordance with law, expeditiously, from the date of production of a certified copy of this order, after ensuring service of notice upon all the respondents and providing opportunity of hearing to all the concerned parties provided there is no other legal impediment. May 5, 2026 Rishabh WRIC No. 17393 of 2026 2 (Manish Kumar Nigam,J.) Digitally signed by :- RISHABH KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad