Allahabad High Court
WRIC/17497/2026 of ANITA Vs STATE OF UP AND 2 OTHERS on 4 May 2026
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 17497 of 2026 Court No. - 36 HON'BLE MANISH KUMAR NIGAM, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and perused the record. 2. The instant writ petition has been filed for following relief: " I-To issue a writ order or direction to the respondent
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
WRIT - C No. - 17497 of 2026
Court No. - 36
HON'BLE MANISH KUMAR NIGAM, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and perused the record.
2. The instant writ petition has been filed for following relief: " I-To issue a writ order or direction to the respondent по. 2 to decide the Restoration/Recall Application filed by the petitioner in Suit No. RST/5323/2025 Computerized Case No. T202505470305323" (Ramayan Prasad Vs. Anita) under section 209 Za Adhiniyam UP Revenue Code 2006 expeditiously within specific period as fixed by the Hon'ble High Court."
3. Contention of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that restoration application is pending consideration and the same has not been decided despite several dates have been fixed. He prayed that the same may be decided, expeditiously.
4. In view of above, no useful purpose would be served in keeping this petition pending.
5. Accordingly, the present petition stands disposed of finally with a direction to respondent No. 2 to consider and decide the aforementioned application, in accordance with law, expeditiously, preferably within a period of twelve weeks from the date of production of a certified copy of this order after ensuring service upon all the opposite parties, giving opportunity of hearing to the parties concerned and without granting unnecessary adjournments to either of the parties provided that there is no other legal impediment.
May 5, 2026 Nitika Sri. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Muhammad Azam Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Manish Kumar Nigam,J.) Anita .....Petitioner(s) State Of Up And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- NITIKA SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad